How the two generations differ in real-world speed and everyday use

Comparing the Lava Agni 4 with the Lava Agni 3 gives a clear picture of how much progress Lava has made between the two generations. Both devices were designed as balanced mid-range phones, but the Agni 4 introduces meaningful upgrades that directly affect day-to-day performance. For UK users looking for a reliable phone that stays smooth over time, these differences matter, especially when considering long-term value.

The biggest shift comes from the chipset. The Agni 4 benefits from a newer and more efficient processor compared to the Agni 3, giving it an advantage in overall speed, multitasking and app responsiveness. Tasks such as switching between messaging apps, browsing, social media and photo editing feel noticeably smoother. The newer chip also runs cooler, which helps during longer usage sessions and improves sustained performance for gaming or video streaming.

Storage and memory technology also see a clear upgrade in the Agni 4. Faster storage allows quicker loading of games, apps and internal files, while improved RAM efficiency keeps background applications stable for longer. On the Agni 3, app reloads become more common when juggling multiple tasks, whereas the Agni 4 maintains apps in memory more effectively. This creates a more fluid experience during everyday activities like online shopping, email handling or document sharing.

Graphical performance shows improvement too. Games that rely on consistent frame rates run more smoothly on the Agni 4, especially during extended sessions. While neither device targets high-end gaming, the Agni 4 handles casual and mid-level titles with better stability. Even in games that push the hardware more heavily, thermal control ensures the Agni 4 stays responsive without sudden lag spikes, which can be more noticeable in the older Agni 3.

In terms of display, both phones offer a high-refresh screen for fluid visuals, but the Agni 4’s panel delivers slightly better brightness and contrast. This contributes to a sharper and more responsive feel when navigating menus or scrolling social feeds. UK users often switch between indoor lighting and outdoor environments, and the extra brightness gives the Agni 4 an advantage for visibility during bright conditions.

Battery efficiency also improves thanks to the newer processor architecture. While both phones offer a similar battery capacity and charging speed, the Agni 4 lasts longer in typical use. Streaming, social media browsing and calls drain the battery more slowly compared to the Agni 3, giving the newer model a slight edge for long UK commutes or long days away from chargers. Power efficiency matters especially in colder UK months, and the Agni 4 benefits from better thermal tuning.

Camera performance indirectly affects perceived speed as well. The Agni 4’s improved image processing results in faster shutter response and quicker image saving, especially in low-light or indoor conditions. While both devices can take solid photos in good lighting, the Agni 4 handles challenging conditions with more confidence. The front camera also performs tasks like face-unlock more quickly, adding to overall convenience.

Software optimisation plays an important role too. The Agni 4 runs a cleaner and more modern version of the operating system with better memory handling and system fluidity. Navigating settings, switching modes and using everyday apps feels faster and more polished. The Agni 3 remains functional but shows more signs of ageing during extended use, particularly when handling new app updates or heavier workloads.

App launch times show a consistent improvement on the Agni 4. Browsing apps like maps, social media and video platforms feel more instant. On the Agni 3, heavier apps take longer to open and can stutter when loading fresh content. This becomes more noticeable over months of use as software updates grow larger and demand more processing power.

Overall responsiveness is where the Agni 4 stands out the most. Scrolling through large photo galleries, switching tabs in browsers and editing short videos all feel smoother compared to the Agni 3. For UK users who keep phones for two to three years, this difference in speed and fluidity is significant. The Agni 4 remains steadier over time, giving it better long-term value.

In summary, the Lava Agni 4 offers a more refined and powerful performance experience compared to the Agni 3. Faster hardware, better efficiency, improved processing and smoother software all combine to create a noticeably more capable device. While the Agni 3 remains adequate for basic users, the Agni 4 provides the stronger choice for those prioritising speed, stability and future-proofing in everyday UK use.